On my recent trip to India , one of the big stories in
the newspaper was the rise of consumer good e-commerce. Flipkart, an Indian company founded by the
ex-Amazon Bansal brothers, recently announce that it had raised over one
billion dollars of funding for expansion projects. A day later, Amazon announced that it would
be investing two billion dollars in its Indian subsidiaries. Of course, this is unsurprising. India is modernizing quickly, and
IT is one of the lead drivers of economic growth. I was in Palo Alto ,
the northern end of Silicon Valley , a few
years back, and waiting for my flight in the Kolkata domestic terminal a few
weeks ago, I was struck by the number of IT nerd look-alikes sporting the flat
combed hair, short-sleeve shirt, pants and laptop look. I was in stark contrast
to the traditional party clothes of Eid, which was two days before. So the rush into this business is no great
surprise. But what worries me is how the
social consequences of this particular business expansion might be.
In Australia ,
e-commerce has finally cut into traditional retail no a broad scale, with
retail growth flat, and employment and tax revenue falling. This has contributed to social
dissatisfaction and hand wringing, but even with the recent cuts to Australia ’s
economic safety net, the effect on the overall way of lie has been modest. This
is because Australia
is a wealth y country, and has a relatively intact safety net. So even with these employment disruptions,
everyone has food to eat, safe drinking water, health cover, etc.
However, this is not the case in India , where native startup
Flipkart and internet giant Amazon have recently announced more than 3 billion
dollars of investment, with the intent of growing their sales by billions of
dollars per year. India has a lot of retailers; with an estimated
40 million of them, they outnumber Australia ’s entire population by
almost a factor of two. And unlike the
corporate-dominated retail scene in Australia , 95% of the Indian retail
sector is owner-operator family style shops.
In general, these are businesses with limited training and financial
means. There isn’t much of a social
safety net, as a number of these folks are barely getting enough to eat as
is.
So what will happen when Indian internet shopping comes of
age, and customers no longer have to brave the dangerous dirty, difficult
streets of their megapolii to buy consumer goods? In rich countries, people displaced by
technological change have retrained using the educational system, fallen back on
the social safety net, or managed to simply get by with less. But never has such a vulnerable segment of
the population been targeted by such an efficient set of competitors.
I hope development allows India to grow its way out of this
potential pitfall. But I am not
optimistic. The same paper announcing
the new Amazon investment also reported that Indian Overseas Bank was suffering
from an unexpected loss in microcredit loan repayments. It would be unfortunate
if the geeky rivalry between Bezos and the Bansal brothers resulted in the
first iFamine.
No comments:
Post a Comment