I recently had to look up the composition of Pyrex glass, and in the process I came across this interesting article in Consumer Affairs.
As everyone who has worked in a lab knows, Pyrex is a borosilicate glass. This is important because this glass composition has a much lower thermal expansion coefficient than standard soda-lime glasses, making it more resistant to rapid changes in temperature.
Evidently, Corning got out of the consumer products business a decade ago, and then
Tempered glass is made by cooling the outer layers of glass faster than the glass can conductively equilibrate. As the core of the glass then cools, it contracts, drawing the outer layers of the glass into compression, while putting the core under tensile stress.
Figure 1. Tempering glass
Just like rocks, compression decreases the ability of fractures to propagate, so the glass is stronger.
The tempered ovenware manufacturer has been very lawyerly about catastrophic dish failure, which means that it is up to us bloggers to speculate about causes.
In order for tempered glass to work, the glass must not undergo annealing at its operating temperature. The compressed and tensile layers are not in equilibrium, so if the rate of internal diffusion becomes fast enough to allow the strain to anneal out, the glass will at best lose its temper, and at worst fail catastrophically.
Diffusion rates obviously temperature dependent, but they also depend on composition. We also know that on historical timescales, hydrogen diffuses into window glass while alkalis leach out.* So a testable hypothesis is this:
Some combination of H-rich foods and baking temperatures accelerates the diffusion of H into the bakeware. This lowers the annealing point below baking temperatures, causing differential annealing and catastrophic failure.
This hypothesis should be easily testable** by even the most cash-strapped geology departments, so if any of you folks are setting up summer undergraduate research projects, here’s your chance to combine rheology and home economics.
* My dad must have read this study when I was a kid, because he depth-profiled Na and H in the shards when I hit a baseball through the garage window...
** If you go for it, please BE SAFE! Exploding hot glass = huge safety issue.
H-rich foods? So you mean baked sauerkraut? Anyone doing this is going to need a serious fume hood.
ReplyDeleteI don't think that breaking glass in an unconfined space would make a good student project. (Says the person who nominally advised the student who wanted to test whether Upheaval Dome could be a impact crater by shooting layers of - I forget what, now - with his grandfather's 30.06. Sometimes, one just has to get out of the way of student enthusiasm. Literally.)
ReplyDeleteI'm trying to think of how the diffusion of H through the glass would be measured. My first reaction was "if I had an SEM with EDS, we could cut sections through the glass and look at diffusion profiles." But H is too light for EDS. (Plus I don't have an SEM.)
Not quite sure, but if you mean acidic that should be amusing, just pour some vinegar into the dish and bake. The fact that the water will evaporate and concentrate the acid, will make it even more fun.
ReplyDeleteKim, one would hopefully design the experiment to confine any explosions to the oven. Which we blow stuff up in all the time.
ReplyDeleteAnd eli, starting with a high temperature acid, like sulphuric, lets you run all the way up to the dry annealing temperature. Once you get a temperature-time curve for that, you try citric, if the 170C sulfuric time is practical.
Kim, you can measure Na out with a SEM, H is generally done with depth profiling SIMS. For large distances, cross-sectional FTIR might work, but good luck cutting tempered glass to the right sample geometry.
I've read of "pyrex" dishes exploding untouched at room temp. So it might not explode in the oven, then explode later even after it's cooled.
ReplyDeleteI'd think that a relatively safe setup would be to enclose the dish in metal insect screening, run the experiment, then smash it and throw away the pieces still contained. But the experimenter is responsible if this turns out to be insufficiently safe.
Chris