tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20092824.post2271071794416637814..comments2024-01-30T19:45:36.648+11:00Comments on Lounge of the Lab Lemming: Calling all AGU membersC W Mageehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09706100504739548720noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20092824.post-74552449945739574022008-01-28T11:58:00.000+11:002008-01-28T11:58:00.000+11:00done!done!EcoGeoFemmehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11236907917990309659noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20092824.post-33533823518346413392008-01-27T19:59:00.000+11:002008-01-27T19:59:00.000+11:00Fine suggestion!Fine suggestion!Simon Donnerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01844831377442275615noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20092824.post-39155636713854388082008-01-27T19:26:00.000+11:002008-01-27T19:26:00.000+11:00Running a lot of carbonates? Check your 44, or yo...Running a lot of carbonates? Check your 44, or your 46/48 ratio.<BR/><BR/>96Zr++ is an unlikely candidate, but if that is the problem, then there should be a gigantic 90+ background (and significant 91, 92, 94, and 96), and those masses are usually very clean.<BR/><BR/>Which instrument do you have again?<BR/><BR/>Another unlikely candidate is ozone, but that should correlate with N if it comes C W Mageehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09706100504739548720noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20092824.post-34927054094606344092008-01-27T17:09:00.000+11:002008-01-27T17:09:00.000+11:00Hi Chuck-Thanks for the head's up - did my civic d...Hi Chuck-<BR/><BR/>Thanks for the head's up - did my civic duty.<BR/><BR/>Say, did you ever see a high m/e = 48 background that was decoupled to the 29 background. I'm starting to do Ti in quartz and had a surprise last week.<BR/><BR/>Looks like you're having fun being a dad.Dr Mike at Otagohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17002470523618539327noreply@blogger.com